<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tradedecision Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/tradedecision-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/tradedecision-review/</link>
	<description>The worst and best in stock trading software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/tradedecision-review/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=153#comment-343</guid>
		<description>I am interested in learning more about this software because of its apparent focus on “dumbing things down”, so to speak.  Nothing bugs me more than an interface that is so laden with technical jargon and market speak that I have no bloody clue what is going on.  I realize that all the extra bonuses and indicators are supposed to help me make better trades but it’s just not how I’m wired.  I really tend to see optimal results when I can simplify the process and think more clearly.  All this other stuff just fogs my mind and creates a situation where I make terrible decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in learning more about this software because of its apparent focus on “dumbing things down”, so to speak.  Nothing bugs me more than an interface that is so laden with technical jargon and market speak that I have no bloody clue what is going on.  I realize that all the extra bonuses and indicators are supposed to help me make better trades but it’s just not how I’m wired.  I really tend to see optimal results when I can simplify the process and think more clearly.  All this other stuff just fogs my mind and creates a situation where I make terrible decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donna h.</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/tradedecision-review/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>donna h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=153#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I just bought this software and so far I like what I see.  It is a very watered down version of some of the more complicated software programs, so for me it is the perfect place to begin.

Even though it is kind of simplified, it has everything that one would need to be successful and make good decisions.  The extras and add ons that it left out, more experienced traders like to have so that they can predict futures a little quicker or analyze charts in ways that they might find useful.  These things are not always necessary though, as Trade Decision will show you.

I think, if you are someone who is just getting started and are easily overwhelmed or confused, starting small is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought this software and so far I like what I see.  It is a very watered down version of some of the more complicated software programs, so for me it is the perfect place to begin.</p>
<p>Even though it is kind of simplified, it has everything that one would need to be successful and make good decisions.  The extras and add ons that it left out, more experienced traders like to have so that they can predict futures a little quicker or analyze charts in ways that they might find useful.  These things are not always necessary though, as Trade Decision will show you.</p>
<p>I think, if you are someone who is just getting started and are easily overwhelmed or confused, starting small is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
