<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuantDeveloper Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/quantdeveloper-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/quantdeveloper-review/</link>
	<description>The worst and best in stock trading software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/quantdeveloper-review/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=174#comment-359</guid>
		<description>There seem to be mixed reviews about QuantDeveloper online.  Some users and programmers have complained that the support team is not that interested in actually offering support, and some have even used terms like “rude” and “dismissive”, which would make any potential buyer have pause.  On the other hand, there are those who say it is a superior product, albeit expensive, and that the support system isn’t as bad as others might suggest.  Most agree that help comes slowly, however, and that there needs to be more documentation so that the learning curve isn’t quite so steep.  But if one is only concerned with power and function then this is worth exploring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seem to be mixed reviews about QuantDeveloper online.  Some users and programmers have complained that the support team is not that interested in actually offering support, and some have even used terms like “rude” and “dismissive”, which would make any potential buyer have pause.  On the other hand, there are those who say it is a superior product, albeit expensive, and that the support system isn’t as bad as others might suggest.  Most agree that help comes slowly, however, and that there needs to be more documentation so that the learning curve isn’t quite so steep.  But if one is only concerned with power and function then this is worth exploring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

