<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erlanger Quote Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/erlanger-quote-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/erlanger-quote-review/</link>
	<description>The worst and best in stock trading software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/erlanger-quote-review/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=112#comment-335</guid>
		<description>As I’ve said many times before in my conversations with other traders and investors, we are coming to a point where the integration of mathematics and statistical modeling into the everyday trader’s toolkit will make it such that almost all your decision are made for you.  It’s a bit scary, quite frankly.  It’s akin to today’s grammar school students who know how to use a calculator inside and out but if you asked them to work out long division with a pencil and paper they would be stumped.  I understand that the purpose of stock software is to make things more efficient but at some point I think it gives people license to turn off their brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I’ve said many times before in my conversations with other traders and investors, we are coming to a point where the integration of mathematics and statistical modeling into the everyday trader’s toolkit will make it such that almost all your decision are made for you.  It’s a bit scary, quite frankly.  It’s akin to today’s grammar school students who know how to use a calculator inside and out but if you asked them to work out long division with a pencil and paper they would be stumped.  I understand that the purpose of stock software is to make things more efficient but at some point I think it gives people license to turn off their brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/erlanger-quote-review/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=112#comment-334</guid>
		<description>There is a good plan behind Erlanger and I wish more programs were based on math because that’s all trading is-- a bunch of math.  Too often every one relies on other things, but Erlanger looks at all those other factors but give a good dose of mathematical.

I just read that this was created for those who have a hard time with Qcharts and I think that is funny because I have a harder time with Erlanger than I do with the Qcharts.

I can use this anywhere and that is why I like it so much, but it is definitely not my favorite program of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a good plan behind Erlanger and I wish more programs were based on math because that’s all trading is&#8211; a bunch of math.  Too often every one relies on other things, but Erlanger looks at all those other factors but give a good dose of mathematical.</p>
<p>I just read that this was created for those who have a hard time with Qcharts and I think that is funny because I have a harder time with Erlanger than I do with the Qcharts.</p>
<p>I can use this anywhere and that is why I like it so much, but it is definitely not my favorite program of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

