<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DasTrader Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/dastrader-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/dastrader-review/</link>
	<description>The worst and best in stock trading software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/dastrader-review/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=190#comment-506</guid>
		<description>This program looks very robust and powerful, but it seems like they’re really catering to bigger groups like brokers, money managers, and clearing firms.  The entire infrastructure has been designed in a way that is most conducive to the needs of the “big guys”, and I guess I’m left wondering where the gaps and holes might be if one of the “little guys” wants to use it.  Though not always the case, I have found that programs that focus on one OR the other tend to offer better, more advanced support systems.  Trying to design a product for everybody usually ends up with somebody getting left out of the usability metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This program looks very robust and powerful, but it seems like they’re really catering to bigger groups like brokers, money managers, and clearing firms.  The entire infrastructure has been designed in a way that is most conducive to the needs of the “big guys”, and I guess I’m left wondering where the gaps and holes might be if one of the “little guys” wants to use it.  Though not always the case, I have found that programs that focus on one OR the other tend to offer better, more advanced support systems.  Trying to design a product for everybody usually ends up with somebody getting left out of the usability metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Stock Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/dastrader-review/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Stock Trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktradingsoftwarereviews.org/?p=190#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Never heard of this one before. Will have to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of this one before. Will have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

